Teams, cliques and bureaucracies. Explore the words that explain how people come together and get things done.
These terms were extracted from Introduction to Sociology – 2nd Canadian Edition by William Little, eCampusOntario (originally published by BCcampus, 2016) which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on Introduction to Sociology by OpenStax (© 2013 Rice University), licensed under CC BY 3.0.
Download this book for free here
A collection of people who exist in the same place at the same time, but who don’t interact or share a sense of identity.
Interestingly, people within an aggregate or category can become a group.
A leader who issues orders and assigns tasks.
As the name suggests, authoritarian leaders issue orders and assigns tasks.
A formal organization characterized by a hierarchy of authority, a clear division of labour, explicit rules, and impersonality.
The term bureaucracy refers to what Max Weber termed “an ideal type” of formal organization (1922/1946).
People who share similar characteristics but who are not connected in any way.
People who share similar characteristics but are not otherwise tied to one another in any way are considered a category.
The structuring of work in a bureaucracy such that each individual has a specialized task to perform.
A clear division of labour refers to the fact that within a bureaucracy, each individual has a specialized task to perform.
Organization that people do not voluntarily join, such as prison or a mental hospital.
Coercive organizations are groups that one must be coerced, or pushed, to join.
The extent to which an individual complies with group or societal norms.
Conformity is the extent to which an individual complies with group norms or expectations.
The specific drives, needs, purposes, or interests of individuals that motivate them to interact with others.
Along with the new musical form of punk rock came new lyrical and thematic contents: anger, disillusionment, anarchy, class politics, etc.
The group of close, personal contacts with whom one confides on personal matters and with whom one chooses to spend free time.
Peter Marsden (1987) refers to one’s group of close social contacts as a core discussion group.
A leader who encourages group participation and consensus-building before acting.
Democratic leaders encourage group participation in all decision making.
A two-member group.
Georg Simmel wrote extensively about the difference between a dyad, or two-member group, and a triad, a three-member group (Simmel, 1908/1950).
The types of rules in a bureaucracy; rules that are outlined, recorded, and standardized.
The existence of explicit rules refers to the way in which rules are outlined, written down, and standardized.
A group function that serves an emotional need.
This group serves emotional needs: expressive functions rather than pragmatic ones.
A leader who is concerned with process and with ensuring everyone’s emotional well-being.
However, the stereotypical expectation of women as expressive leaders is still prevalent.
Large, impersonal organizations.
Categorize the different types of formal organizations.
The study of how specific social contents are organized into regular, coordinated social forms.
This mutual influence in turn creates enduring social forms (hence the term formal sociology to describe Simmel’s work).
The patterns of behaviour that guide individuals’ actions in different social settings.
However, this attunement also enables everyone to introduce new elements into the interaction and to invent new musical or social forms (or renew old ones).
An invisible barrier that prevents women from achieving positions of leadership.
One concept for describing the situation facing women’s access to leadership positions is the glass ceiling.
Refers to any collection of at least two people who interact with some frequency and who share a sense that their identity is somehow aligned with the group.
This would seem to be a grievance worthy of a movement, but simply having a grievance does not explain the ways in which movements take form as groups.
The tendency to conform to the attitudes and beliefs of the group despite individual misgivings.
This phenomenon is known as groupthink, the tendency to conform to the attitudes and beliefs of the group despite individual misgivings.
A clear chain of command found in a bureaucracy.
Hierarchy of authority refers to the aspect of bureaucracy that places one individual or office in charge of another, who in turn must answer to her own superiors.
An abstract model of a recurring social phenomenon that describes the form and logical relation of components.
The term bureaucracy refers to what Max Weber termed “an ideal type” of formal organization (1922/1946).
The absence of personal feelings from a professional situation.
Bureaucracies are also characterized by impersonality, which takes personal feelings out of professional situations.
A group a person belongs to and feels is an integral part of his or her identity.
In-groups and out-groups are subcategories of primary and secondary groups that help identify this dynamic.
Orientation toward a task or goal.
These groups serve an instrumental function rather than an expressive one, meaning that their role is more goal- or task-oriented than emotional.
A leader who is goal oriented with a primary focus on accomplishing tasks.
An instrumental leader is one who is goal-oriented and largely concerned with accomplishing set tasks.
The theory that an organization is ruled by a few elites rather than through collaboration.
Finally, as Robert Michels (1911/1949) suggested, bureaucracies are characterized by the iron law of oligarchy in which the organization is ruled by a few elites.
A hands-off leader who allows members of the group to make their own decisions.
In contrast, a laissez-faire leader (French for “leave it alone”) is hands-off, allowing group members to self-manage and make their own decisions.
The main focus or goal of a leader.
Leadership function refers to the main focus or goal of the leader.
The style a leader uses to achieve goals or elicit action from group members.
She stands out among the party leaders as both the only female and the only leader focused on changing leadership style.
The increasing presence of the fast-food business model in common social institutions.
The McDonaldization of society (Ritzer, 1994) refers to the increasing presence of the fast-food business model in common social institutions.
A research focus on the properties of large scale, society-wide, social interactions.
Finally, at the macro-level of analysis, the focus is on the properties of large-scale, society-wide social interactions: the dynamics of institutions, classes, or whole societies.
A research focus on the characteristics of networks, groups, and organizations.
At the meso-level of analysis, the focus shifts to the characteristics of specific networks, groups, and organizations (i.e., collectivities).
A research focus on the social dynamics of small groups and face-to-face interaction.
At the micro-level of analysis, the sociologist would be interested in the interpersonal structures and role-play that governs how various specific individuals (players, coaches, managers, owners, fans, etc.) interact face to face.
A bureaucracy where membership and advancement are based on merit as shown through proven and documented skills.
This is often seen as a function of equal access to education, meritocracy (where individual merit determines social standing), and formal or informal measures to eliminate social discrimination.
Organizations that people join to pursue shared interests or because they provide intangible rewards.
Normative organizations, also called voluntary organizations, are based on shared interests.
A group that an individual is not a member of and may compete with.
In-groups and out-groups are subcategories of primary and secondary groups that help identify this dynamic.
Small, informal groups of people who are closest to us.
Sociologist Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929) suggested that groups can broadly be divided into two categories: primary groups and secondary groups (Cooley, 1909/1963).
The residual qualities like pleasure that people experience from the mere fact of being together, regardless of the content of the interaction.
Both were examples of what he called the play form of social interaction, or pure sociability.
Groups to which an individual compares herself or himself.
In Canadian society, peer groups are common reference groups.
Larger and more impersonal groups that are task-focused and time-limited.
Sociologist Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929) suggested that groups can broadly be divided into two categories: primary groups and secondary groups (Cooley, 1909/1963).
A collection of people tied together by a specific configuration of connections.
A social network is a collection of people who exchange resources (emotional, informational, financial, etc.) tied together by a specific configuration of connections.
An organization in which participants live a controlled life and in which total resocialization occurs.
Goffman (1961) states that most coercive organizations are total institutions.
The tendency for cultural creations to detach themselves from lived experience and become increasingly complex, specialized, alienating, or oppressive.
He developed an analysis of the tragedy of culture in which he argued that the cultural creations of “subjective culture”.
A three-member group.
Georg Simmel wrote extensively about the difference between a dyad, or two-member group, and a triad, a three-member group (Simmel, 1908/1950).
An organization that people join to fill a specific material need.
The third type are utilitarian organizations, which, as the name suggests, are joined because of the need for a specific material reward.